Sunday, December 23, 2018

'How Far Did Henry VIII’s Reign Go in Beginning a New Era in Tudor Kingship\r'

'How distant did atomic number 1 VIII’s die hard over begin a new succession in Tudor kingship? total heat the ordinal and henry the ordinal were truly different in m any ways, their style of belief and aims clearly had different intentions. hydrogen the ordinal ruled quite safely and avoided contend as much as contingent whilst being extremely greedy and neurotic with money. Where as Henry the 8th was youth and precious to sum up back the glory eld and gain a unvoiced reputation, instinctive to skin and go to state of state of fight at on the whole costs, whilst being unkind in punish manpowerts. From the beginning of Henry the eighths reign replaces began to take place and perhaps a whole new season.Some aspects did stay the standardized from Henry the sevenths rule though. One patent continuity was that the Tudor bloodline had been passed a capacious, safekeeping the same family ruling England. Which eliminated quite a lot of threat from k een opposition. Henry the eighth was freshish and healthy which was a promising thought at the eon for the public. The position of men and women didn’t flip either, women still had barely any rights and could shadow speak their thoughts or argue with men’s views. They were expected to do feminine activities and produce children who were possible heirs to the throne.As Henry the eighth needed to produce at least one heir, he decided to get hitched with Catherine of Aragon, (a Spanish princess) after many geezerhood of weighing out other options. He used Catherine just corresponding his baffle did to stabilise and secure a unbending relationship with Spain and improving foreign relations. most other factor that was kept the same were the bonds and recognisances between the crown and the nobility, which threatened a all right to the aristocracy if they weren’t to remain unwavering to the king and break his trust. These were real less-traveled with the nobility, but have gotled f bodily functions being formed, eliminating threat all the same again.A common characteristic with both Henry the eighth and seventh was their irrational demeanor with money as they didn’t control or use it very wisely. Henry the seventh splashed out on parties and extravagant entertainment, to uphold a loaded reputation. When his countersign wanted to spend it on war and battles to gain back a unanimous and glorious reputation, when it wasn’t affordable. Although some aspects stayed similar or the same, the legal age of the rebirth was consistent of change. Henry the eighth was young and feisty, seen as a scented and sparingly ulnerable new face to the thrown take out excitement from the public. His attitude was the oppositeness of Henry the sevenths, he wanted to bring back the glory days and looked up to role models such as, King Arthur and the Knights of the bust Table, to gain back a strong reputation. Unlike his bugger off, Henry became very unpitying and wasn’t afraid to sentence punishments and showed lower-ranking mercy to those who betrayed his trust. One physical exercise of this was the movement of two of his father’s close together(predicate) advisers, Richard Empson and Edmund Dudley.They were arrested on fictitious charges of treason, even though little evidence existed. Henry wanted to show he wasn’t victorious any prisoners and so he penalise them a year later. They were involved in enforcing the bonds and recognisances so Henry soon became very favourite with the nobility, as he’d killed two of the people they hated the most. Whilst as well as maybe giving them the impression that he is more persuadable and naive as he is so young. Henry began changing his advises and councillors to men he could relate to better, like Thomas Wolsey, a very braw character of the Tudor court and a trusting adviser to Henry.Henry began to rely on his advisers more t o do the paperwork side of things and allowed them more independence. Whilst he was extremely active, remote his father, and participated in sports of all kinds. Some say he was slightly more manipulated and persuaded in his junior geezerhood by his advisers compared to his father. One example may be when he was win over to sign a peace pact in 1510 with Louis XIII (king of France), by William Warham and Richard Fox. Their reasons were that war or an invasion on France would be too expensive and fruitless, despite Henrys wishes he signed the treaty anyway.Despite this it wasn’t long before plans were made for an invasion; Henry was actively seeking war and action so he was to be viewed as a strong king and willing to fight for his country. Very much unlike his Father who was cautious and avoided war as much as possible. Henry too broke from the church in Rome, against his father’s views and beliefs. Over all I think the transition from Henry the seventh to Henry the eighth was mostly a new era. Although there were elements of persistence and continuity, the majority of Henry the eighths reign was consistence of change and he carried out a completely different attitude to what his father did.Henry the 7th was greedy with his money, he wanted to be safe and cautious, avoiding war and confrontation as much as he could, whilst transaction mostly with paperwork. He was ruthless when short necessary but never exceeded in gaining a strict reputation. He was very unpopular with the public and I intend they were ready for someone feisty and fresh to take over the thrown like Henry the eighth. Who was not at all wanting to hold back from war or confrontation, he constantly looked for opportunities to fight and to bring back ‘the glory days’.Not particularly interesting in doing any paperwork until his later years as he actively participated in sports in his youth. He was ruthless and showed no mercy when glide slope to deciding peop le’s fait and punishment. He was also much more popular than his father at the beginning oh his years and his reputation was of a handsome young man, who was quite impressionable. This clearly shows the extent as to how different both Father and son’s attitudes and style to kingship were and how the new era began to evolve. Aimee Fenton-Fearn\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment